🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I historically steered clear of significant use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. My preference was for story direction and session development to be determined by player choice rather than random chance. Recently, I decided to change my approach, and I'm incredibly happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Watching an Improvised Tool

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who often asks for "luck rolls" from the participants. This involves picking a type of die and defining consequences tied to the roll. It's essentially no distinct from consulting a random table, these are created on the spot when a character's decision has no clear resolution.

I opted to test this technique at my own game, mostly because it appeared engaging and offered a change from my usual habits. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing dynamic between pre-determination and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Session Moment

At a session, my players had concluded a large-scale fight. Later, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one succumbed; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a profoundly moving moment where the party discovered the corpses of their companions, still holding hands in death. The party conducted last rites, which was especially meaningful due to earlier story developments. As a final touch, I decided that the forms were strangely transformed, showing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's contained spell was exactly what the group required to solve another pressing quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate such magical coincidences.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This experience caused me to question if randomization and making it up are actually the essence of tabletop RPGs. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Players frequently excel at ignoring the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to think quickly and fabricate details in the moment.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these abilities without going completely outside your preparation. The trick is to apply them for minor decisions that have a limited impact on the overarching story. For instance, I wouldn't use it to decide if the central plot figure is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to determine whether the characters arrive moments before a key action takes place.

Strengthening Player Agency

This technique also serves to keep players engaged and cultivate the feeling that the game world is responsive, shaping in reaction to their choices in real-time. It prevents the feeling that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole script, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of the game.

This approach has historically been integral to the game's DNA. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. While current D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. However, it's also fine no problem with stepping back and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Control is a big factor in a DM's role. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to release it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Embrace a little randomness for inconsequential outcomes. The result could discover that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you might have scripted by yourself.