🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most famous pictures of the 20th century portrays an unclothed girl, her arms spread wide, her expression contorted in agony, her body scorched and flaking. She appears running toward the lens while fleeing a bombing in South Vietnam. To her side, additional kids also run out of the bombed hamlet in the region, with a background featuring black clouds and soldiers.

This Global Effect from a Powerful Picture

Shortly after its distribution during the Vietnam War, this photograph—formally titled The Terror of War—evolved into a traditional hit. Viewed and discussed by millions, it has been generally credited for energizing global sentiment opposing the US war in Vietnam. An influential thinker afterwards commented how this profoundly unforgettable photograph of nine-year-old Kim Phúc in agony probably did more to heighten public revulsion toward the conflict compared to extensive footage of televised barbarities. A legendary English photojournalist who covered the war called it the ultimate photograph of what would later be called the televised conflict. One more veteran photojournalist stated that the image stands as quite simply, among the most significant photographs in history, specifically from that conflict.

A Long-Held Claim Followed by a New Claim

For 53 years, the photo was assigned to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a young South Vietnamese photographer working for an international outlet at the time. However a controversial new film streaming on a streaming service argues which states the well-known image—long considered to be the pinnacle of photojournalism—might have been taken by someone else present that day in Trảng Bàng.

As claimed by the film, "Napalm Girl" may have been taken by a stringer, who offered his work to the AP. The assertion, and its subsequent research, stems from a man named a former photo editor, who states how a powerful photo chief directed the staff to alter the photograph's attribution from the original photographer to Nick Út, the only AP staff photographer on site during the incident.

The Search for Answers

The source, advanced in years, emailed a filmmaker a few years ago, seeking help to locate the unnamed stringer. He mentioned that, if he could be found, he hoped to extend an apology. The journalist reflected on the independent stringers he knew—likening them to modern freelancers, who, like local photographers at the time, are routinely marginalized. Their contributions is commonly questioned, and they function under much more difficult situations. They are not insured, they don’t have pensions, little backing, they often don’t have adequate tools, and they remain extremely at risk as they capture images in their own communities.

The filmmaker wondered: Imagine the experience to be the individual who took this iconic picture, if in fact it wasn't Nick Út?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it could be profoundly difficult. As a student of war photography, particularly the highly regarded documentation of Vietnam, it might be groundbreaking, maybe legacy-altering. The respected heritage of the photograph among the diaspora is such that the director whose parents left at the time was hesitant to pursue the film. He expressed, I was unwilling to challenge this long-held narrative that Nick had taken the photograph. Nor did I wish to disturb the current understanding of a community that always admired this accomplishment.”

The Investigation Unfolds

However both the investigator and the director felt: it was important asking the question. As members of the press are going to hold others in the world,” said one, “we have to can pose challenging queries about our own field.”

The documentary documents the team while conducting their research, from testimonies from observers, to call-outs in today's Saigon, to archival research from additional films recorded at the time. Their search finally produce a name: a freelancer, employed by a television outlet at the time who sometimes worked as a stringer to international news outlets as a freelancer. In the film, a moved the claimant, like others in his 80s based in the US, claims that he handed over the image to the news organization for minimal payment with a physical photo, yet remained plagued by not being acknowledged over many years.

This Response and Additional Analysis

The man comes across in the film, thoughtful and calm, yet his account proved controversial within the world of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to